Marine biologist Dr Catherine Jadot studied the salema porgy as part of her PhD research. In her words: “More research is needed to identify the toxin responsible for getting hallucinogenic effects from fish. Today, there isn’t enough research to know what compounds cause this.”
The creation of a platform to allow physicians, travellers, and local community members to report suspected cases of dreamfish intoxication and collaborate with marine toxin monitoring programmes (such as for ciguatera poisoning) could help net more data on the phenomenon.
To stand the best chance of unravelling the mystery of the dreamfish, it may be wise to focus research efforts in areas where there are multiple species of dreamfish, such as Réunion Island. This may make it easier to research than in areas such as the Mediterranean, where fish intoxication is more uncommon and inconsistent. Interviewing fishermen and coastal communities could contribute to mapping cases according to geographical location, while highlighting implicated species and any seasonal variation in intoxication events.
If the psychoactive compounds responsible for dreamfish intoxication are indeed dietary in origin – which is possible, if not probable – a logical place to begin trying to unravel this mystery would be to find what degree of dietary overlap is shared by the different dreamfish species. This could be achieved by observing the feeding behaviour of target species and comparing their gut contents to ascertain what organisms (e.g. algae or plankton) they are feeding on. Then any species or algae consumed by these fish could be screened for psychoactive compounds.
A lack of prior knowledge about what class of compounds the active substances underpinning dreamfish intoxication belong to makes identifying them tricky. However, analytical techniques such as mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy could be applied, and candidate molecules could be identified by looking for those likely to exhibit biological activity based on the mass spectrometry results (e.g. indole alkaloids or polyketides). NMR spectroscopy could be applied as a follow-on step to characterise any target compounds.
Suspect dreamfishes could potentially be halved, bioassayed to confirm psychoactivity, and then tissue samples from the other half analysed. Or fish suspected to harbour the active compounds could be compared with other members of the same species thought unlikely to harbour them, with the chemical analytical results compared.
Tissue samples from dreamfishes could potentially be used in neurobehavioral or receptor-based assays, with any fractions yielding dream-enhancing or hallucinatory effects prioritised. If active compounds are characterised, in vitro and in vivo pharmacological research could elucidate their receptor affinity profiles and some of their effects.
If the chemical culprit is some kind of marine algae or plankton, this could then likely be cultured, which would allow for more research on the compounds in question. These compounds – or others derived from them – could hold medical or therapeutic utility, or be used in the study of dream states. Future collaboration between marine biologists, natural product chemists, pharmacologists, and neuroscientists could help unravel the mystery of the dreamfish.
Sam Gandy | Community Blogger at Chemical Collective
Sam is one of our community bloggers here at Chemical Collective. If you’re interested in joining our blogging team and getting paid to write about subjects you’re passionate about, please reach out to Sam via email at samwoolfe@gmail.com
share your toughts
Join the Conversation.