A thinker like Wittgenstein was not especially interested in metaphysics. “The meaning of a word is its use in language”, he wrote. Its mistake is to treat different uses of “real” as pointing to a single metaphysical Reality superordinate over all its concrete particular uses.
If we examine what we mean by ‘real’, we find some common notions with certain “family resemblances”: to be true, authentic, empirically verified, to convey a specific claim that was hitherto concealed (‘the real reason’), or as a mode of encouragement, or tool to naturalise oppressive and tragic social systems (‘get in the real world’).
In psychedelic practice, the drug experience has its own social function that is simply different. To the “straight” world, the visions are hallucinations, foreign entities – yet the psychedelic world is engaged in an activity, known as ‘tripping’, in which the visions are regularised and familiar, and serve psychosocial functions. Critics might argue that LSD visions are radically private and thus solipsistic. But their visions are communicable. Geometric patterns and vivid colours are so consistent that they have entered popular iconography and design. To call them “hallucinations” is to use a psychiatric label as a battering ram on a specific ‘in-between-ness’ of psychedelic consciousness, in which neural categories are liquefied for a precise purpose.
This doesn’t entail total relativism. The psychedelic “real” should know its place. The drugged state is marked by brevity and a spatial and social separation from everyday life. If all goes well, one returns to the sober “real” in which our usual criteria for truth and verification apply, and walls don’t move.
What counts as “real,” as Mark Fisher reminds us, is not a neutral category but a politicised one. It is used to naturalise the routines of modern life (climate catastrophe as “just reality”) or to mark a certain hopeless authenticity (“getting real”, in losing aspiration to systemic change). Under psychedelic perception, the sober ‘real’ is simply compartmentalised, in a fashion not unlike what occurs every day under our current political order. Individuals ‘forget’, or ‘repress’, destructive and repressive dynamics that may run downstream of their occupations, in order not to be fired. The psychedelic and sober ‘reals’ usually coexist in a twisted balance. Festivals, raves, and underground scenes maintain a separate cultural economy.
While the ‘functional’ model may have its uses, does it smack of ‘psychedelic exceptionalism’? Would we say that ‘sleep-deprived real’ or ‘amphetamine real’ were anything other than hallucinatory deviations of the ‘sober real’, which is simply ‘reality’? Sure, seeing ‘shadow people’ involves a certain ‘life world’ inaccessible to those who haven’t been on a binge – but who cares? What takes priority when their claims compete: the ‘sober real’ or the ‘psychedelic real’? When a trip produces violence or psychosis, the sober real must reassert its authority.
Creating a metaphysical essence known as The Real may be wrong-footed. But this doesn’t undercut the basic naturalist claim: that the best bet we have for what we call ‘real’ is the world of science and verification. No matter how radical one’s belief in the ‘realer’ nature of the psychedelic, we must always ‘return’. For where else would we find our food and drink?
It is up to us what ‘use’ we make of our perceptions, even if we were ‘just tripping’ by common standards.
Ed Prideaux | Community Blogger at Chemical Collective
Ed is one of our community bloggers here at Chemical Collective. If you’re interested in joining our blogging team and getting paid to write about subjects you’re passionate about, please reach out to Sam via email at samwoolfe@gmail.com
share your toughts
Join the Conversation.